Triple Triad forum dupes - please ignore

what do you mean who won

 

T110E5
I think

 

T110E5
I think

 

Yeah really. Imagine those higher tier SPG's. Would be so funny. Hearing...err...seeing all the complaints.

 

Yeah really. Imagine those higher tier SPG's. Would be so funny. Hearing...err...seeing all the complaints.

 

They need to show WoWp what a real special is

 

They need to show WoWp what a real special is

 

You have the right to guess 2 times

post 2 times your guess
when every one has posted 2 times we will give the right answer

good luck to all

 

You have the right to guess 2 times

post 2 times your guess
when every one has posted 2 times we will give the right answer

good luck to all

 

I am ready for ┻━┻ ︵ヽ(`▭´)ﾉ︵ ┻━┻ (double flipping. XD)!

 

I am ready for ┻━┻ ︵ヽ(`▭´)ﾉ︵ ┻━┻ (double flipping. XD)!

 

It does look cool.
Too bad I am terrible with lights, lol

 

what

 

what

 

Russian Q&A with developers from WG, done by EU player Silentstalker, on his blog "For the Record"

- SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35
- spall liner will have no effect, if a HE shell splash (or blast itself) hits a zone, where there is no armor (like on the open-topped new German TD’s) – SerB states that it reduces damage proportionally to armor and when the armor is 0, the reduction is also 0 – spall liner doesn’t reduce the damage of complete penetrations (SS: BUT the improved saving throw for crew will still work)


- camo factor of the WT E-100 and RhB WT won’t be commented on (SS: a player asked whether WT E-100 has worse armor than Maus)
- apparently the frequency of server checks (synch of client and server) is 0,1s on average
- actually, a gun module apparently consists of two modules: an internal part and the external part (SS: that means the breech of the gun has 0 armor and is subjected to saving throws only, which means guns with a HUGE breech, like the Sturer Emil, can get its gun damaged even by being hit on the side armor
- SerB states that the developers never planned to introduce +/-1 MM spread, because it’s not needed – for example in such a case the T-34/76 couldn’t face the Tiger
- for now there are no details on the transfer of E-50 to tier 10, SerB states it is just one of the ideas
- penetrating the tank wrecks with partial penetration loss will not come in forseeable future
- there is a separate collision model for a live tank and separate (simplified) model for a wreck
- Q: “We’ve seen Yuri Pasholok’s post on the 88mm L/71 autoloader, will we see it in Jagdpanther and King Tiger?” A: “It won’t fit in KT” (SS: its implementation into Jagdpanther is thus not excluded)
- tank hulls (both life tanks and wrecks) do not serve as a visibility obstacle (SS: a huge stone will block spotchecks, a tank won’t) – this rule however doesn’t apparently apply on the “object” wrecks, that are a part of the map (SS: for example the burning Malinovka Panther near northern base) – these do count as obstacles

 

New group was deff. needed, nice addition to the current system, and the color is nice

 

New group was deff. needed, nice addition to the current system, and the color is nice

 

I think one more group should be added between regulars and royal ogres

 

I think one more group should be added between regulars and royal ogres